Malta vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Malta
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Netherlands
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Malta rank
173rd
Netherlands rank
171st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
00000196119912022

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 3.9 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Netherlands ahead.

Malta ranks 173rd and Netherlands ranks 171st of 181 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Netherlands
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Netherlands
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Netherlands
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Netherlands
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Netherlands
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Malta or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Malta and Netherlands?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Malta ranks 173rd and Netherlands ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.