Kenya vs Mauritius: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Kenya
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Mauritius
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Kenya rank
117th
Mauritius rank
115th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Kenya
  • Mauritius
0000196119912022

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Kenya, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 117th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kenya
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kenya
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kenya
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kenya
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kenya
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kenya
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Kenya or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Kenya as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Kenya and Mauritius?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mauritius?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Kenya and Mauritius rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Kenya ranks 117th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Mauritius: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/kenya/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/kenya/mauritius/">Kenya vs Mauritius: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.