Jordan vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Jordan
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Netherlands
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Jordan rank
168th
Netherlands rank
171st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Jordan
  • Netherlands
000000196119912022

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Netherlands, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 168th and Netherlands ranks 171st of 181 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Jordan or Netherlands?
Jordan, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Netherlands as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Jordan and Netherlands?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Netherlands?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Jordan and Netherlands rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Jordan ranks 168th and Netherlands ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/netherlands/">Jordan vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.