Indonesia vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Indonesia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Malaysia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Indonesia rank
50th
Malaysia rank
52nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Malaysia
00000196119912022

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Malaysia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 50th and Malaysia ranks 52nd of 181 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Indonesia or Malaysia?
Indonesia, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Malaysia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Indonesia and Malaysia?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Malaysia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2022.
How do Indonesia and Malaysia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Indonesia ranks 50th and Malaysia ranks 52nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/indonesia/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/indonesia/malaysia/">Indonesia vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.