IDA only vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

IDA only
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Suriname
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
IDA only rank
4th
Suriname rank
5th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • IDA only
  • Suriname
000000196119912022

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in IDA only, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Suriname's figure about 8.2 times IDA only's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 5th of 43 groups.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), IDA only or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in IDA only as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between IDA only and Suriname?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Suriname?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do IDA only and Suriname rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
IDA only ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/ida-only/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/ida-only/suriname/">IDA only vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.