IBRD only vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

IBRD only
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Iceland
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
IBRD only rank
24th
Iceland rank
25th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Iceland
0000196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in IBRD only, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Iceland's figure about 8.2 times IBRD only's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 24th and Iceland ranks 25th of 43 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), IBRD only or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in IBRD only as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between IBRD only and Iceland?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Iceland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
IBRD only ranks 24th and Iceland ranks 25th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/ibrd-only/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/ibrd-only/iceland/">IBRD only vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.