Hungary vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Hungary
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Mauritania
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Hungary rank
159th
Mauritania rank
156th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Hungary
  • Mauritania
000000196119912022

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Hungary, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 159th and Mauritania ranks 156th of 181 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Hungary or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Hungary as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Hungary and Mauritania?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mauritania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do Hungary and Mauritania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Hungary ranks 159th and Mauritania ranks 156th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/hungary/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/hungary/mauritania/">Hungary vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.