Haiti vs Sri Lanka: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Haiti
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Sri Lanka
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Haiti rank
75th
Sri Lanka rank
72nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Haiti
  • Sri Lanka
000000196119912022

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Haiti, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.

Haiti ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Haiti
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Haiti
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Haiti
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Haiti
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Haiti or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Haiti as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Haiti and Sri Lanka?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Sri Lanka?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Haiti and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Haiti ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Sri Lanka: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/haiti/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/haiti/sri-lanka/">Haiti vs Sri Lanka: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.