Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Ethiopia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Ethiopia rank
66th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
64th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0000196119912022

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 66th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 64th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Ethiopia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Ethiopia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Ethiopia ranks 66th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 64th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/ethiopia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/ethiopia/tanzania/">Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.