Eswatini vs Somalia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Eswatini
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Somalia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Eswatini rank
80th
Somalia rank
78th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Somalia
0000196119912022

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 80th and Somalia ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Somalia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Somalia
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Somalia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Somalia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Somalia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Eswatini or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Eswatini and Somalia?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Somalia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Somalia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Eswatini ranks 80th and Somalia ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Somalia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/somalia-fed-rep/">Eswatini vs Somalia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.