Equatorial Guinea vs Mongolia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Equatorial Guinea
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Mongolia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
46th
Mongolia rank
45th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mongolia
00000196219922022

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 46th and Mongolia ranks 45th of 181 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mongolia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mongolia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Equatorial Guinea or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 46th and Mongolia ranks 45th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mongolia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/mongolia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mongolia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.