Egypt vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Egypt
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Singapore
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Egypt rank
174th
Singapore rank
177th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Egypt
  • Singapore
00000196119912022

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Singapore, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.8 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Egypt ranks 174th and Singapore ranks 177th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Singapore
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Singapore
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Singapore
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Egypt
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Egypt
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Egypt
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Egypt or Singapore?
Egypt, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Singapore as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Egypt and Singapore?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Egypt and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Egypt ranks 174th and Singapore ranks 177th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/egypt-arab-rep/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/egypt-arab-rep/singapore/">Egypt vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.