East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
30th
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Kyrgyzstan
0000196119912022

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 9.9 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 43 groups.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kyrgyzstan
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kyrgyzstan
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kyrgyzstan
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/kyrgyz-republic/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.