Denmark vs Jordan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Denmark
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Jordan
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Denmark rank
166th
Jordan rank
168th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Denmark
  • Jordan
000000196119912022

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Jordan, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Jordan ahead.

Denmark ranks 166th and Jordan ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Jordan
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Denmark
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Denmark or Jordan?
Denmark, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Jordan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Denmark and Jordan?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Jordan?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Denmark and Jordan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Denmark ranks 166th and Jordan ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Jordan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/jordan/">Denmark vs Jordan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.