Congo vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- Congo
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.
That makes Congo's figure about 8.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 11th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 13th of 181 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 1970s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 1980s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 1990s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Congo or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Congo, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Congo and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Congo ranks 11th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 13th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.