Colombia vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Colombia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
IDA blend
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Colombia rank
21st
IDA blend rank
18th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Colombia
  • IDA blend
000000196119912022

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in IDA blend, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Colombia's figure about 4.9 times IDA blend's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 21st and IDA blend ranks 18th of 181 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia IDA blend Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Colombia or IDA blend?
Colombia, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in IDA blend as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Colombia and IDA blend?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and IDA blend?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Colombia and IDA blend rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Colombia ranks 21st and IDA blend ranks 18th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/colombia/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/colombia/ida-blend/">Colombia vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.