Chile vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Chile
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
OECD members
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Chile rank
35th
OECD members rank
36th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Chile
  • OECD members
00000196119912022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in OECD members, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chile's figure about 14.1 times OECD members's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 35th and OECD members ranks 36th of 181 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Chile or OECD members?
Chile, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in OECD members as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Chile and OECD members?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and OECD members?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Chile and OECD members rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Chile ranks 35th and OECD members ranks 36th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/oecd-members/">Chile vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.