Burundi vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Burundi
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Central Europe and the Baltics
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Burundi rank
42nd
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
41st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Burundi
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
0000196119912022

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Burundi's figure about 19.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 42nd and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st of 181 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Burundi
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Burundi
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Burundi
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Burundi or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Burundi, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Burundi and Central Europe and the Baltics?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Central Europe and the Baltics?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Burundi and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Burundi ranks 42nd and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Burundi vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.