Brazil vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Brazil
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
OECD members
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Brazil rank
36th
OECD members rank
36th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Brazil
  • OECD members
0000196119912022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in OECD members, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Brazil's figure about 13.9 times OECD members's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 36th and OECD members ranks 36th of 181 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Brazil or OECD members?
Brazil, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in OECD members as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Brazil and OECD members?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and OECD members?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Brazil and OECD members rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Brazil ranks 36th and OECD members ranks 36th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/oecd-members/">Brazil vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.