Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Costa Rica: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Costa Rica
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
51st
Costa Rica rank
49th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Costa Rica
000000196119912022

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 51st and Costa Rica ranks 49th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 51st and Costa Rica ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Costa Rica: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/costa-rica/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Costa Rica: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.