Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bhutan
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Solomon Islands
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Solomon Islands rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Solomon Islands
00000196719942022

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Solomon Islands ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bhutan
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bhutan
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bhutan
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bhutan
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bhutan
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bhutan or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bhutan and Solomon Islands?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Solomon Islands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Solomon Islands rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Solomon Islands ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/solomon-islands/">Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.