Belize vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Belize
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Nepal
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Belize rank
27th
Nepal rank
29th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Belize
  • Nepal
000000196119912022

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 27th and Nepal ranks 29th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belize
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belize
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Belize or Nepal?
Belize, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Belize and Nepal?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Nepal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Belize and Nepal rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Belize ranks 27th and Nepal ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/belize/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/belize/nepal/">Belize vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.