Belgium vs Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Belgium
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Denmark
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Belgium rank
164th
Denmark rank
166th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Belgium
  • Denmark
000000196119912022

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.4 times Denmark's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 164th and Denmark ranks 166th of 181 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Belgium or Denmark?
Belgium, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Belgium and Denmark?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Denmark?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Denmark rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Belgium ranks 164th and Denmark ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/denmark/">Belgium vs Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.