Belarus vs Namibia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Belarus
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Namibia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Belarus rank
85th
Namibia rank
84th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Belarus
  • Namibia
00000198020012022

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 85th and Namibia ranks 84th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belarus
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Belarus
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Belarus or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Belarus and Namibia?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Belarus and Namibia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Belarus ranks 85th and Namibia ranks 84th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Namibia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/namibia/">Belarus vs Namibia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.