Barbados vs Maldives: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Barbados
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Maldives
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Barbados rank
170th
Maldives rank
172nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Barbados
  • Maldives
0000196119912022

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Maldives, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 2.4 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Maldives ahead.

Barbados ranks 170th and Maldives ranks 172nd of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Maldives in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Maldives Difference Ahead
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Maldives
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Maldives
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Maldives
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Maldives
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Barbados
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Barbados or Maldives?
Barbados, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Maldives as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Barbados and Maldives?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Maldives?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Barbados and Maldives rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Barbados ranks 170th and Maldives ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Maldives: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/maldives/">Barbados vs Maldives: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.