Bangladesh vs Morocco: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bangladesh
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Morocco
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
111th
Morocco rank
113th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Morocco
00000196119912022

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Morocco, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 111th and Morocco ranks 113th of 181 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bangladesh or Morocco?
Bangladesh, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Morocco as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bangladesh and Morocco?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Morocco?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and Morocco rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bangladesh ranks 111th and Morocco ranks 113th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Morocco: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/morocco/">Bangladesh vs Morocco: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.