Argentina vs Latvia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Argentina
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Latvia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Argentina rank
86th
Latvia rank
88th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Argentina
  • Latvia
0000196119912022

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Argentina ranks 86th and Latvia ranks 88th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Latvia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Argentina
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Latvia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Argentina or Latvia?
Argentina, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Argentina and Latvia?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Latvia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Latvia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Argentina ranks 86th and Latvia ranks 88th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Latvia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/latvia/">Argentina vs Latvia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.