Antigua and Barbuda vs Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Antigua and Barbuda
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Korea
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Antigua and Barbuda rank
160th
Korea rank
158th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Korea
0000196119912022

How they compare

Korea currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.3 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

Across all 46 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 160th and Korea ranks 158th of 181 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Korea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Korea
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Korea
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Korea
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Korea
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Korea
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Antigua and Barbuda or Korea?
Korea, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Antigua and Barbuda and Korea?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Korea?
46 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2022.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Korea rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 160th and Korea ranks 158th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/korea-rep/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.