South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
South Africa
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
South Africa rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
159th
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- South Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 183 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
| 1970s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
| 1980s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
| 1990s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), South Africa or Zimbabwe?
- South Africa, at 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- South Africa ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.