South Africa vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

South Africa
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
South Africa rank
156th
South Sudan rank
153rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • South Africa
  • South Sudan
00000196119912022

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 156th and South Sudan ranks 153rd of 183 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), South Africa or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between South Africa and South Sudan?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do South Africa and South Sudan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
South Africa ranks 156th and South Sudan ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/south-sudan/">South Africa vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.