Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- Singapore
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
That makes Singapore's figure about 5.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 183 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1970s | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1980s | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Singapore or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Singapore, at 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Singapore ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.