Serbia vs Zambia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Serbia
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Zambia
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Serbia rank
134th
Zambia rank
131st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Serbia
  • Zambia
00000196119912022

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 131st of 183 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Serbia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Serbia and Zambia?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Serbia ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 131st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Zambia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/serbia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/serbia/zambia/">Serbia vs Zambia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.