Serbia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Serbia
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Serbia rank
134th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
137th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Serbia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
000000196119912022

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 134th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 137th of 183 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Serbia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Serbia, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Serbia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Serbia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Serbia ranks 134th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 137th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/serbia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/serbia/tanzania/">Serbia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.