Madagascar vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- Madagascar
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
Across all 62 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 62nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 60th of 183 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1970s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1980s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1990s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2000s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2010s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2020s | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Madagascar or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Madagascar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Madagascar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Madagascar ranks 62nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 60th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.