Low income vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
Low income
0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore
0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Low income rank
37th
Singapore rank
38th
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- Low income
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
That makes Singapore's figure about 5.3 times Low income's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 37th and Singapore ranks 38th of 43 groups.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1970s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1980s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Low income or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Low income as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Low income and Singapore?
- 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Singapore?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Low income and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Low income ranks 37th and Singapore ranks 38th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.