Israel vs Kenya: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Israel
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2021
Kenya
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Israel rank
158th
Kenya rank
157th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Israel
  • Kenya
00000196119912022

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 158th and Kenya ranks 157th of 183 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Israel or Kenya?
Kenya, at 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Israel as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Israel and Kenya?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Kenya?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Israel and Kenya rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Israel ranks 158th and Kenya ranks 157th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Kenya: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/israel/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/israel/kenya/">Israel vs Kenya: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.