Georgia vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Georgia
0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore
0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Georgia rank
37th
Singapore rank
38th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Georgia
  • Singapore
0000.0010.001196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Singapore ahead.

Georgia ranks 37th and Singapore ranks 38th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Georgia or Singapore?
Georgia, at 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Georgia and Singapore?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Georgia ranks 37th and Singapore ranks 38th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/georgia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/georgia/singapore/">Georgia vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.