Georgia vs Low income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Georgia
0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Low income
0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Georgia rank
37th
Low income rank
37th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Georgia
  • Low income
000.0010.001196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 5.3 times Low income's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 37th and Low income ranks 37th of 183 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Low income Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Georgia or Low income?
Georgia, at 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Low income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Georgia and Low income?
0.0006 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Low income?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Low income rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Georgia ranks 37th and Low income ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Low income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/georgia/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/georgia/low-income/">Georgia vs Low income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.