Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Slovenia
0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
33rd
Slovenia rank
32nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Slovenia
0000.0010.0010.001196119912022

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 183 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Equatorial Guinea or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0009 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/slovenia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.