Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ireland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Ireland
0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
Ireland rank
46th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ireland
0000.0010.001196119912022

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Ireland ranks 46th of 183 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ireland?
Ireland, at 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ireland?
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ireland?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ireland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Ireland ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ireland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ireland/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ireland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.