Australia vs Republic of Moldova: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Australia
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Republic of Moldova
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2022
Australia rank
149th
Republic of Moldova rank
150th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Australia
  • Republic of Moldova
00000196119912022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 149th and Republic of Moldova ranks 150th of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Australia or Republic of Moldova?
Australia, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre against 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in Republic of Moldova as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Australia and Republic of Moldova?
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Republic of Moldova?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Australia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Australia ranks 149th and Republic of Moldova ranks 150th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Republic of Moldova: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/australia/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/australia/moldova/">Australia vs Republic of Moldova: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.