Switzerland vs East Timor: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Switzerland
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
East Timor
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Switzerland rank
67th
East Timor rank
64th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Switzerland
  • East Timor
000000196119912022

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Switzerland, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.3 times Switzerland's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Switzerland ranks 67th and East Timor ranks 64th of 183 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Switzerland or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Switzerland as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Switzerland and East Timor?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and East Timor?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Switzerland and East Timor rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Switzerland ranks 67th and East Timor ranks 64th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Switzerland vs East Timor: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/switzerland/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/switzerland/timor-leste/">Switzerland vs East Timor: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.