South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

South Africa
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
South Africa rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
000000196119912022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in South Africa, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in South Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
South Africa ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.