Poland vs Saint Lucia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Poland
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Saint Lucia
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Poland rank
112th
Saint Lucia rank
109th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Poland
  • Saint Lucia
0000196119912022

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Poland, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 112th and Saint Lucia ranks 109th of 183 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Poland or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Poland as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Poland and Saint Lucia?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Saint Lucia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Poland and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Poland ranks 112th and Saint Lucia ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Saint Lucia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/poland/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/poland/st-lucia/">Poland vs Saint Lucia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.