Paraguay vs South Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Paraguay
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
South Asia
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Paraguay rank
35th
South Asia rank
38th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Paraguay
  • South Asia
0000196119912022

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in South Asia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 15.2 times South Asia's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Paraguay ranks 35th and South Asia ranks 38th of 183 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay South Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Paraguay or South Asia?
Paraguay, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in South Asia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Paraguay and South Asia?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and South Asia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Paraguay and South Asia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Paraguay ranks 35th and South Asia ranks 38th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs South Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/paraguay/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/paraguay/south-asia/">Paraguay vs South Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.