Norway vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Norway
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
OECD members
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Norway rank
7th
OECD members rank
10th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Norway
  • OECD members
000000196119912022

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in OECD members, a difference of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Norway's figure about 7.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 10th of 183 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
1970s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
1980s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
1990s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Norway or OECD members?
Norway, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in OECD members as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Norway and OECD members?
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and OECD members?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Norway and OECD members rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Norway ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 10th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/norway/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/norway/oecd-members/">Norway vs OECD members: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.