North America vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

North America
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Norway
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
North America rank
7th
Norway rank
7th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • North America
  • Norway
00000196119912022

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in North America, a difference of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Norway's figure about 4.6 times North America's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

North America ranks 7th and Norway ranks 7th of 43 groups.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North America Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), North America or Norway?
Norway, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in North America as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between North America and Norway?
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North America and Norway?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do North America and Norway rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
North America ranks 7th and Norway ranks 7th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North America vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/north-america/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/north-america/norway/">North America vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.