New Zealand vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

New Zealand
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Norway
0.0001 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
New Zealand rank
9th
Norway rank
7th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Norway
0000196119912022

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 9th and Norway ranks 7th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Norway in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person New Zealand
1970s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person New Zealand
1980s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person New Zealand
1990s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person New Zealand
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Norway
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), New Zealand or Norway?
Norway, at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person against 0.0001 billion cubic meters per person in New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between New Zealand and Norway?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
New Zealand ranks 9th and Norway ranks 7th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/new-zealand/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/new-zealand/norway/">New Zealand vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.