Nauru vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Nauru
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Uganda
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Nauru rank
133rd
Uganda rank
135th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Nauru
  • Uganda
00000196119912022

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Uganda, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uganda ahead.

Nauru ranks 133rd and Uganda ranks 135th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Uganda
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Uganda
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Uganda
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Uganda
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Uganda
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Uganda
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Nauru or Uganda?
Nauru, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Uganda as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Nauru and Uganda?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Uganda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Nauru and Uganda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Nauru ranks 133rd and Uganda ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/naoero/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/naoero/uganda/">Nauru vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.