Myanmar vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Myanmar
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
0 billion cubic meters per person
in 2022
Myanmar rank
34th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
31st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Myanmar
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
000000196119912022

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per person.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 5.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 31st of 183 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person 0 billion cubic meters per person Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Myanmar or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Myanmar, at 0 billion cubic meters per person against 0 billion cubic meters per person in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Myanmar and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0 billion cubic meters per person, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sub-Saharan Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Myanmar and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Myanmar ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/myanmar/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-capita/myanmar/sub-saharan-africa/">Myanmar vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per capita
Unit
billion cubic meters per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.